“Registered Provisional Immigrant” status in new immigration bill

On Wednesday, the Senate officially filed an 844 page immigration bill which will be the

The "Gang of 8" U.S. Senators who proposed the immigration bill.

The “Gang of 8″ U.S. Senators who proposed the immigration bill.

focus of debate for the next couple months as the Senate debate over what should stay included and what should be removed.

The bill focuses on four main areas:

  1. immigrant visas;
  2. nonimmigrant visas (such as workplace programs);
  3. border security; and
  4. enforcement within the U.S.

The bill proposes a $3 billion increase for border security, including electrified fences, more frequent patrols, and surveillance technology such as drones.

As for permanent residency, the bill would only be available to people who entered the U.S. before December 31, 2011. The details state that these people would be eligible for “registered provisional immigrant” status. After ten years of RPI status, you can apply for legal permanent residency.

Furthermore, to apply for RPI, the applicant cannot have any felony convictions in the U.S. or abroad. Also, three misdemeanor convictions may cause denial of RPI status. The illegal voting law will still carry over and prevent RPI applications from being successfully approved.

Withstanding the bars to applying, there is a $500 fine. Once approved, the applicant can work and travel out of the country freely.

It is important to remember that this is just a proposal and is not the current law. As always, we will keep a close eye on any developments. We have faith that reform will come and it will be for the better.

If you want to read the bill yourself, please visit: http://www.aila.org/content/fileviewer.aspx?docid=44069&linkid=260326

Posted in Employment, Family, Green Card, Immigration, Laws & Court Cases, News, Nonimmigration, Travel | Leave a comment

My Wonderful Experience at The Chicago Academy Elementary School

Gave a speech about immigration to the 5th graders at The Chicago Academy Elementary School. The 5th graders are in the middle of an essay writing contest where the winner gets a college scholarship. They were great kids who were genuinely interested in learning.

Many children of this city are immigrants, or have family that recently immigrated. The questions and stories we discussed were well thought out and at times personal. In this respect, I saw myself in a lot of them.

I am looking forward to doing it again soon. Thank you, Chicago Academy Elementary and good luck!

Posted in News, Scholarships | Leave a comment

Illinois to allow undocumented immigrants to obtain driver licenses

A big problem for many of our clients is the inability to obtain a driver’s license. Not anymore, at least for Illinois. Last week, Gov. Pat Quinn’s office released a statement that he will sign the bill offering undocumented immigrants driving privileges.

The driver’s license will be called the Temporary Visitor Driver’s License (TVDL). The illinois road signTVDL will be valid for three years and renewable. Applicants will need to provide proof that they resided in Illinois for at least one year, show proof of address, and proof of automobile insurance. The applicant will also need to pass the usual driving test.

The TVDL will look and act different than regular driver’s licenses. Firstly, TVDLs cannot be used for identification. Secondly, TVDLs cannot be used to purchase guns, vote, or board a plane. Likewise, the TVDL cannot be used to obtain benefits from the state.

Allowing undocumented immigrants to drive seems like common sense. The state saves money because the once uninsured now have auto insurance. Secondly, arresting and deporting people who are only driving to work or dropping their children to school is not a common sense approach to immigration and only costs taxpayers more to fight a fruitless fight.

Although obtaining a driver’s license may seem like a basic right to many, for undocumented immigrants, it is a small victory in a long road ahead. The freedom to move should not be dependent on citizenry within our borders, just like our other great freedoms. Illinois is moving towards the future and we are thankful for that.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Transgender Immigration and the Scope of “Marriage”

Chicago immigration lawyerI’ve had many people from the LGBT community ask whether federal immigration benefits apply to them if their state allows same-sex marriage. The answer is usually in the negative (because, in not so many words, federal law and state law are different), but there was one particular case that I would like to give attention to.

An interesting Policy Memorandum circulated throughout the USCIS offices occurred last year instructing officers how to handle transgender marriage and immigration benefits. The case involves a transgender couple who applied for and ultimately won their immigration case based on their marriage.

Here’s a brief rundown of the facts surrounding this case:

The case involved a petitioner born in North Carolina who underwent sex reassignment surgery and then amended her birth certificate, reflecting her transition from mail to female. Subsequently she married her husband in North Carolina… North Carolina law does not permit [same sex marriage].

The couple then applied at USCIS for immigration benefits claiming spousal relationship. USCIS denied the couple based on the state’s [North Carolina] definition of marriage, but the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled because of the specific facts of this case, it was indeed a heterosexual marriage under state law and valid for federal immigration purposes.

The USCIS Policy Memo requires that they will follow the Board of Appeals’ ruling but specifically state that three main criteria:

  1. there must be a legal changing of gender (not necessarily sex reassignment surgery) before the marriage;
  2. the marriage must be recognized as heterosexual under the law where the marriage took place; and
  3. the law where the marriage took place does not bar a marriage between a transgender individual and an individual of the other gender.

USCIS also explicitly stated they will not request any documentation to sex reassignment surgery, but will look to other evidence of showing heterosexual marriage and proof of changing gender.

While this may not be the answer many of you reading may be looking for, it’s a start. But I remain hopeful for a more common-sense way to handle immigration in the future regarding LGBT issues than dancing around the meaning of “marriage” like the case above.

Posted in Family, Green Card, Immigration, News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

I-601A – The Provisional Waiver

Chicago immigration attorney

This Spring, certain aliens may be eligible for a provisional waiver which allows them to know if their waiver is approved before leaving the US

Beginning March 4, 2013, certain aliens related to U.S. citizens may apply for what is being called a “provisional waiver.”

Under this new rule, aliens who are applying for a waiver for unlawful presence, and are still living in the United States, would be able to submit their waiver application and get a predetermined approval before leaving the United States to do their interview.

In other words, this new rule would allow aliens who are approved, and living in the United States, to know in advance that their case has been approved and that they would not be away from their family in another country for too long of a time.

Under the old rule, all aliens who have accrued sufficient unlawful presence would have to apply and interview for a waiver outside the United States, even if they lived in the United States. Families often felt conflicted on whether or not they should apply for a waiver because the negatives far outweighed the benefits.

So, let’s go over who can apply:

  • immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (spouses, parents, and certain children);
  • those who do not have an interview scheduled at a U.S. consulate abroad before the new rule takes effect ; and
  • those whose cases only deal with unlawful presence (cases with criminal issues or other immigration issues cannot use this new rule).

All eligible applicants would still have to show “extreme hardship” to their qualifying relatives, just as with the old rule. Furthermore, approval of the provisional waiver does not grant any immigrant status immediately and will not provide work authorization, social security number, or driver’s license. These benefits arrive when the alien obtains permanent residency after approval.

For more information about unlawful presence, waivers, and extreme hardship, please visit the blog, or click on the links above.

If you think you or a loved one can benefit from this new rule, please contact an attorney to get an opinion on your specific case.

Posted in Family, Green Card, Immigration, Laws & Court Cases, News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Report: U.S. spends more per year on Immigration Enforcement than the FBI, DEA, Secret Service, and ATF combined

 

Chicago immigration lawyer

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images - Report says U.S. government spends more on immigration enforcement than all other federal criminal agencies combined

The Washington Post has picked up an interesting report conducted by the Migration Policy Institute claiming that the U.S. government spent $18 billion on immigration enforcement last year.

The amazing thing is that this number is 24% more than all expenditures for the FBI, the Secret Service, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives… combined.

The two main components of government immigration enforcement are the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Each agency spends quite a lot in fingerprinting, photographing, and detaining suspected risks.

The report also states that almost 430,000 people are detained every year for immigration related violations. Also, deportations have risen from 30,000 (in 1990) to almost 400,000 (in 2011). For anyone doing the math, ICE statistics show that over 4.4 million people have been deported since 1990.

The rest of the report, titled “Immigration Enforcement in the United States: The Rise of a Formidable Machinery,” can be found by clicking the link above.

There is a upward trend in spending and enforcing immigration through all venues of our government. Whether that spending has actually benefited our country remains to be seen however.

Posted in Deportation, Green Card, Immigration, News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

USCIS to Accept H-1B Petitions for Fiscal Year 2013 Beginning April 2, 2012

Chicago H1B immigration attorneyU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on March 27, 2012, that it will begin accepting H-1B petitions subject to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 cap on Monday April 2, 2012. Cases will be considered accepted on the date that USCIS takes possession of a properly filed petition with the correct fee. USCIS will not rely upon the date that the petition is postmarked.

The congressionally mandated numerical limitation on H-1B petitions for FY 2013 is 65,000. Additionally, the first 20,000 H-1B petitions filed on behalf of individuals who have earned a U.S. master’s degree or higher are exempt from the fiscal year cap.

USCIS will monitor the number of petitions received and will notify the public of the date on which USCIS received the necessary number of petitions to meet the H-1B cap. If the number of applications received exceeds the numerical cap, USCIS will randomly select the number of petitions required to reach the numerical limit from the pool of petitions received on the final receipt date. USCIS will reject cap-subject petitions that are not selected, as well as those received after the final receipt date.

Petitions for new H-1B employment are exempt from the annual cap if the beneficiaries will work at institutions of higher education or related or affiliated nonprofit entities, nonprofit research organizations or governmental research organizations. Petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries who will work only in Guam or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands are exempt from the cap until December 31, 2014. Employers may continue to file petitions for these cap-exempt H-1B categories seeking work dates starting in FY 2012.

Petitions filed on behalf of current H-1B workers who have been counted previously against the cap also do not count towards the congressionally mandated H-1B cap. Accordingly, USCIS will continue to process FY 2012 petitions filed to:

  • extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States;
  • change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers;
  • allow current H-1B workers to change employers; or
  • allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.

H-1B petitioners should follow all statutory and regulatory requirements as they prepare petitions to avoid delays in processing and requests for evidence. USCIS has developed detailed information, including a processing worksheet, to assist in the completion and submission of FY 2013 H-1B petitions.

U.S. businesses use the H-1B program to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise in specialized fields, such as scientists, engineers, or computer programmers.

Posted in Employment, Immigration, Student | Leave a comment

EB-1A: Aliens with Extraordinary Abilities

Chicago immigration attorneyOverview:

Today, we will discuss the EB-1A visa, otherwise known as the “Alien with Extraordinary Ability” visa. This type of visa is usually reserved for aliens that have “risen to the very top of their field of endeavor.” There are a couple ways to prove an alien has reached the top of his or her field, such as being awarded a Nobel Prize or an Academy Award. These are obviously wonderful pieces of evidence, but what about for more “regular” aliens who are still at the top of their field?

Requirements for Eligibility:

In a case where the applicant does not have an internationally recognized award, USCIS has provided a list of criteria, in which the applicant should meet at least three of the options. The list is:

  • Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence.
  • Membership in associations which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their fields.
  • Published material in professional/major trade publications or major media about the alien and relating to the alien’s work field.
  • Participation as a judge (individually or as a part of a panel) evaluating the work of others.
  • Original scientific, scholarly, or artistic contributions of major significance.
  • Authorship of scholarly articles in professional journals or other major media.
  • Artistic exhibitions/shows.
  • Leading role within an organization/establishment with a distinguished reputation.
  • High salary/compensation for services in comparison to others.
  • Commercial success within the performing arts, as shown by either box office receipt figures or cassette, compact disk, video, or DVD sales figures. The alien must also show that the alien’s admittance into the United States will substantially benefit the United States in the future.

Further Considerations:

In addition to meeting three of the requirements above, the applicant must also show that he or she will continue the same line of work if admitted into the United States. The applicant should detail how he or she will continue working in the same field. Additionally, other supporting evidence is also accepted, such as letters of recommendation from prospective employers and colleagues attesting to the continued work.

The EB-1A, like all EB-1 visas, do not require Labor Certification. In other words, no job offer is required and the applicant may sponsor himself for permanent residency without the aid of an employer. Likewise, if the applicant changes jobs during the process, then it will not affect the EB-1A application.

Posted in Employment, Green Card, Immigration | Leave a comment

President Obama Increases Streamlining of Tourist Visas

President Barack Obama on January 19, 2012, approved streamlining foreign tourist visa applications for international tourists who wish to visit the United States. The move specifically focuses on increasing the number of Chinese and Brazilian tourists in order to boost tourism and spur job growth.

President Obama announced his plan at the Disney World theme park in Orlando, Florida. The park, city, and state all heavily rely on tourism dollars for their economy.

Disney and other American tourism industry leaders have been advocating for more efficient visa procedures, which were severely tightened after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“I want America to be the top tourist destination in the world,” Obama said. “The more folks who visit America, the more Americans we get back to work. It is that simple.”

The visa changes do not necessarily reflect Obama’s vision for immigration reform. Instead, the move is being interpreted as a concentrated effort to spur the still lagging job market. Still, the order is in welcoming arms for tourists and immigrants worldwide. Obama said the new steps would help cut through red tape and make it easier for foreign tourists to come to the United States.

An estimated one million jobs will be created in the next decade according to the White House if the United States focused on increasing its role in the international travel market.

The plans details include:

* An increase in visa processing in China and Brazil by 40 percent in 2012. Furthermore, the order targets 80 percent of the applicants to be interviewed within a three week period.

* A pilot program to speed the visa process for applicants from China and Brazil. This will include waiving interviews for low risk applicants.

* Adding Taiwan as a participating visa-waiver country.

 

Posted in Laws & Court Cases, News, Nonimmigration, Travel | 5 Comments

Deception and Disorder in Immigration Court

A study published by the Center for Immigration studies has been released this week. Former immigration judge, Mark H. Metcalf, authored the study entitled “Built to Fail: Deception and Disorder in America’s Immigration Courts.”

The article focuses on the rampant disregard of immigration court rulings, whether it be from deportation orders or simple court appearances. The study makes some interesting findings:chicago immigration attorney

  • Very few aliens who file lawsuits to remain in the United States are deported, even though immigration courts – after years of litigation – order them removed.
  • Deportation orders are rarely enforced, even against aliens who skip court or ignore orders to leave the United States.
  • Aliens evade immigration courts more often than accused felons evade state courts. Unlike accused felons, aliens who skip court are rarely caught.
  • From 1996 through 2009, the United States allowed 1.9 million aliens to remain free before trial and 770,000 of them – 40 percent of the total – vanished. Nearly one million deportation orders were issued to this group – 78 percent of these orders were handed down for court evasion.
  • From 2002 through 2006 – in the shadow of 9/11 – 50 percent of all aliens free pending trial disappeared. Court numbers show 360,199 aliens out of 713,974 dodged court.
  • For years, the Department of Justice (DoJ) has grossly understated the number of aliens who evade court. In 2005 and 2006, DoJ said 39 percent of aliens missed court. Actually, 59 percent of aliens – aliens remaining free before trial – never showed.
  • Since 1996, failures of aliens to appear in court have never dipped below 30 percent.
  • Enforcement of deportation orders is now nearly non-existent. Removal orders are not enforced unless aliens have committed serious crimes.
  • Unexecuted removal orders are growing. As of 2002, 602,000 deportation orders had not been enforced. Since then, another 507,551 have been added to the rolls. Today, unexecuted removal orders number approximately 1,109,551 – an 84 percent increase since 2002.
  • U.S. immigration courts rule in favor of aliens 60 percent of the time. DoJ statistics suggest aliens win only 20 percent of the time.
  • The Department of Justice tells Congress that aliens appeal deportation orders only 8 percent of the time. In fact, over the last 10 years aliens appealed deportation orders 98 percent of the time.
  • Since 1990, immigration court budgets have increased 823 percent with taxpayers footing the entire bill. Aliens pay no more to file their cases today than they did in 1990.
  • From 2000 through 2007, tax dollars paid aliens’ court costs. Taxpayers underwrote the appeals of aliens ordered removed for criminal convictions and fraudulent marriages.
  • U.S. immigration judges carry huge caseloads. In 2006 – the courts’ busiest year ever – 233 judges completed 407,487 matters. All work of DoJ’s trial and appellate lawyers combined equaled only 289,316. By comparison, federal district and circuit courts, with 1,271 judges, completed 414,375 matters.
  • The only possible way the Justice Department’s misrepresentations will be corrected is for the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to audit America’s immigration courts.
  • An Article I court – a court created through Congress’s constitutional authority over immigration – is the surest solution for those fleeing persecution, while balancing America’s fundamental interest in secure borders and an effective immigration system.

 

Posted in Deportation, Immigration, Laws & Court Cases, News | Tagged , | 8 Comments