Why Green Card Holders May Get Deported

Chicago Immigration AttorneyLegal Permanent Residents (LPRs or green card holders) have a unique status in the US. They are allowed to legally stay and work in the US, but they are can still be deported since they are not US citizens. There are many ways a green card holder may lose his LPR status and this article will discuss three most common ways: crimes involving moral turpitude, conditional resident status and abandonment.

Reason 1: Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude

By far, one of the most uncertain situations in immigration occurs when a green card holder commits a crime. LPRs are not deported for all crimes, but only crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT). CIMTs can be confusing because it involves state crimes, but it is the federal government which reviews the state’s statutes in determining what is a CIMT. In other words, a person commits a state crime but the federal government interprets the state law in making its own federal decision.

As a result, what may be a CIMT in one state may not be a CIMT in another state, even though the names of the crimes are similar. In determining what is a CIMT, courts generally look to whether the state statute contained elements of fraud, dishonesty, an intent to do harm and other behavior with “readiness to do evil.” Committing a CIMT can result in arrest and deportation. It is important to speak with an immigration attorney about CIMT, since criminal defense attorneys may not take your immigration status into account when making deals with the prosecution.

Reason 2: Conditional Resident Status

Another reason an LPR might be deported is if his LPR was conditional; in most instances, this involves a fiancee visa. A fiancee visa is issued to a soon-to-be bridge/groom to marry a US citizen only (no LPRs). The visa allows the bride/groom to marry within 90 days. Upon marriage, the spouse of the US citizen receives conditional resident status that they remain married to the US citizen spouse. Of course, there are many exceptions such as domestic abuse and others. The conditional resident status must be removed during the 90 days before the second anniversary of the conditional residence status date. Not removing this condition may result in unlawful status and possible deportation.

Reason 3: Abandonment

Obtaining a green card is a long process, but losing it can happen very quickly. It is possible for a person to abandon their green card, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. A green card holder can file a form to abandon their green card, but this is somewhat rare and should be considered only in very specific circumstances. The other more common scenario is involuntarily abandonment. This occurs when the green card holder is outside the US for an extended period of time.

Simply coming into the US once in a while will not count. There must be an intent to stay in the US. This can be done by filing taxes, renting a home or working in the US. In other words, there must be an intent to stay in the US when you have a green card. Leaving the country for an extended amount of time without any of the above precautions can be inferred that the LPR has no intent to stay in the US and therefore intends to abandon their green card.

About Shawn

Consumer Law Group is a full-service immigration law firm. We help familes and businesses file visa applications, fight deportation proceedings, and everything in between. Speak with an experienced Chicago Immigration attorney for a free in-person consultation today: (312) 267-0355
This entry was posted in Deportation, Green Card, Travel and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Why Green Card Holders May Get Deported

  1. Wale says:

    I had to spend efforts and have the capacity to glance at the entire responses, however i truly loved your write-up. It showed to become beneficial in my opinion fundamentals particular to many of the commenters in this posting! It is usually great unsuitable for your needs but not only be educated, and also involved! Thanks.

  2. Aliza Podewils says:

    Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. was truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing.

  3. Loretta Toups says:

    I got good info from your blog

  4. MM says:

    This an interesting article website

    • Sarah says:

      You need to podvire more data. There is a famous case named, Ayanbadejo v. Chertoff. John and Felicia Ayanbadejo filed an action against the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) after an adverse immigration decision. The USCIS issued a notice of denial of the I-130 petition and the I-485 application. The Ayanbadejos filed an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA affirmed the USCIS decision without a written order and John filed a petition for review, which was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.The Court decided that they are precluded from reviewing those decisions ?specified in the statute? to be discretionary. The I-485 application fell under the category of discretionary decisions, but the I-130 petition was subject to court review. As we do not know where you live, we cannot recommend a vey good immigration lawyer, you but should be able to find one through the bar association in your town.

  5. 熟女 says:

    can you please update more?

  6. Shep says:

    I do love the manner in which you have presented this specific situation and it does indeed give me some fodder for thought.